Hi Michael, > One questions remains: What about > the date of the version in the box? I think that replacing the date with > mentioning the "rolling release" scheme would describe it the best way. > Else someone would need to change the box at every commit... good question -- I'd recommend to just delete the date in the box. Rolling release is already mentioned in the left side text. >From customers' perspective: If I wanted to find a new IMAP frontend and therefore looking into wikipedia's SquirrelMail-page, it would be important to see, e.g., "most recent version 1.4.23-snv", then looking at the official download page and there I see "yes, 1.4.23-svn is there!". So, I get it and all is fine. Thanks for helping! Best regards, Markus P.S. Someone here interested in updating the English wikipedia page? --------------------------- Original message --------------------------- > Am 2019-08-13 17:43, schrieb Markus Robert Kessler: >> Hi Michael, >> >> thanks for asking -- I wrote: >> >> "Das Kürzel SVN, für Apache Subversion zeigt an, dass mittlerweile >> Fehlerbereinigungen und kleinere Erweiterungen nicht mehr unmittelbar >> als >> neue Versionsnummern veröffentlicht werden, sondern dass die jeweils >> aktuelle Hauptversion direkt im Versions-Kontrollsystem weiter gepflegt >> wird." >> >> Meaning: >> >> "The shortcut SVN, for Apache Subversion, points out that meanwhile >> bugfixes and minor extentions not necessarily always lead to publishing >> them as new versions. Instead, the current main version is being >> maintained directly within the version control system." >> >> I think, this describes precisely enough, why we have 1.4.23-svn as the >> most recent stable version. >> >> And, yes -- we all have it in daily usage. >> >> In my opinion it is the best and most convenient IMAP surface. >> So, it is import that people get this info. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Markus > > Hello Markus, > > ok, I reviewed your changes. In fact 1.4.23-svn is the "Rolling Release" > of the stable branch, right? I've added this wording to the wiki page, I > think most do understand this pattern. One questions remains: What about > the date of the version in the box? I think that replacing the date with > mentioning the "rolling release" scheme would describe it the best way. > Else someone would need to change the box at every commit... > > Best regards, > Michael Fritscher > > > ----- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
