Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:17 AM, nethubonline <nethubonline@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Although the non-compliant headers is sender's problem, but actually it >> is a >> SPAM, so we have nothing to do on it. > > As I recall, there is in fact a user agent header that points you to a > valid email marketing software vendor. This could be considered less > spammy in that you can in fact address the issue to that software > vendor. > Sender software should be fixed, but invalid headers should be unable to put receiver program in infinite loop. Paul Lesniewski wrote: > >> Secondly, we believe that even a >> webmail software should not be "fixed" to read non-compliant headers, but >> I >> think ..... you will agree that it should not generate 100% CPU loading >> to >> affect the whole server. >> >> Sorry for the insufficient information, here it is: > > Thanks for this info. Unfortunately, I am unable to do anything more > about this until I can reliably retrieve your sample email. The > attachment you originally sent is corrupt for me when I download it. > Please send attachments directly to this mailing list instead of using > Nabble. > Archive is gzipped twice. In extension based world it should be called abc.tar.gz.gz -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/load-continuously-for-some-emails-in-some-languages-with-utf-8-charset-tp29008490p29479063.html Sent from the squirrelmail-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users