On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Paul Lesniewski <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > Well, I INITIALLY applied the patch during daytime, at the time of >> > highest load. Maybe that was unwise and caused the runaway condition... >> >> So can I infer that the second version was never used during peak >> time? (and also that it has not been peak time yet since you reverted >> to the first version?) > > Both versions were used at peak time. > (and the inital version you provided is still running at the moment) Well, you've certainly done your fair share of helping. The load issue is a bit unnerving... anyone else able to test this before I commit it? -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
