> I have the following setup which had been working for a quite long time > all the below are running on one server > Centos Os 5 > Sendmail 8.13 > apache > MailScanner 4.77 > mailwatch > Squirrel mail 1.4.13 This is old with several known security holes. You need to upgrade. > now soemtime back i upgraded my squirrel mail to 1.4.17 and everything > working fine. Still too old with known security holes. > but I did notice that all emails ( with or without attachments) sent from > SQmail web interface were being whitelisted as seen from mailwatch > interface. We don't support SqWebMail. You'll need to go here for that: http://www.courier-mta.org/sqwebmail/ > this happens since localhost (127.0.0.1 ) is being whitelisted. > > Actually i found that when in upgrade of SQ mail the Server > Settings==>General==>Sendmail or SMTP was sendmail > > so i changed the setting to SMTP and specified the IP address of my > mailserver which is the same machine itself > > Now after I did that emails sent from the SQmail Web interface are not > whitelisted and attachments do get blocked which is perfect and what i > want > > but the problem is that any email ( with or without attachment ) takes > very very long time over two or three after clicking on the send icon for > the page to refresh So consult your SMTP logs. If sendmail is fast, then the problem probably isn't anything to do with SquirrelMail. > But if the conf.pl setting is changed to sendmail instead of SMTP it goes > within a 2 or 3 seconds So go look at why your SMTP server is so slow. > When I had Squirrel mail 1.4.13 the setting was SMTP in conf.pl and it was > working fine > > I did try changing the setting of SMTP from IP address to hostname or > fully domain name but problem persists > > also i tail the maillog and see that the log of the sent message takes a > very long time to appear Can you install 1.4.13 and 1.4.19 on the same machine at the same time, using the same configuration file? If you can and 1.4.13 is still faster, THEN you can start to figure out what changed. Otherwise, I don't think it's a SquirrelMail problem. > apprecite your kind advice and suggestions as to what could be wrong -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donations.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
