Re: Not matching Alternate Identity on replies in SM 1.4.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 11, 2008 10:21 pm, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> Alan,
>
>> On Mon, April 28, 2008 2:36 pm, Alan in Toronto wrote:
>>>>> Matching of Alternate Identity is not working in my SM 1.4.13.
>
>>>>> It works in 1.4.9a: when I Reply to a message addressed to an
>>>>> alternate identity,
>>>>> SM
>>>>> automatically inserts that alternate identity into the From address.
>
>>>>> SM 1.4.13 does not insert the alternate identity in to the From on
>>>>> replies.
>>>>> I tested with all plugins disabled and the result is the same.
>
>>>> I'm not able to reproduce this issue.  I have several identities that I
>>>> use regularly that match without issues.  Are you in the to:? cc?
>
>>> Some other odd behaviour, in case it gives you an idea:
>>>
>>> - if I email FROM my default identity to an alternate identity, then
>>> reply, it never
>>>  inserts the alternate identity in the From as it should and as 1.4.9a
>>> did.
>>> - if I email FROM an alternate identity (e.g. Bob) to another alternate
>>> identity
>>> (e.g. Sally), then reply, it mistakently inserts the original sender's
>>> FROM
>>> (Bob)rather than the identity to which the message was sent (Sally), so
>>> the reply is
>>> actually going from the original sender and to that same sender.
>>>
>>> So, this is rather odd behaviour and I can't yet give exact conditions
>>> to predict
>>> behaviour. What I know for sure at the moment is that the functionality
>>> is not
>>> working properly and not working as it did in 1.4.9a.
>>>
>>> Let me know what else you'd like me to check.
>
>> Any follow-up on this? Anything further you'd like me to check, or would
>> you like a test account on the server? I wasn't the only one to report
>> this, so it's not unique to my installation.
>
> Sorry about the delay in replying, I've been snowed under at work.

Not a problem at all. I just didn't want this to get lost.

> I've
> just given the test case a whirl, and managed to reproduce the issue.

Excellent. That's half the battle right there. If you can see it, then I'm sure it
will get solved.

> I'll take a look at the code, and figure out what's going on.

Thanks Jonathan. I'll be happy to do any testing you want.






-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
-----
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]

  Powered by Linux