Search squid archive

Re: FW: Encrypted browser-Squid connection errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/22 9:49 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
proxy autoconfig is javascript-based but uses very limited javascript.

My comment was more directed at why is $LANGUAGE_DOESNT_MATTER used /in/ /the/ /location/ /field/?

while I agree javascript is not ideal, it's very hard to configure proper proxy configuration without using scripting language.

and, when we need scripting language, it's much easier to use something that has been implemented and is used in browsers.

I understand and agree with (re)using JavaScript as the chosen language. That's not my concern. (See above.)

because standard servers and not proxies usually run on standard ports.

I trust that you don't intend it to be, but that feels like a non-answer to me.

That's sort of tantamount to saying "I drive on the shoulder because there are cards on the road."

HTTP(S) connections /are/ the HTTP protocol and the standard port for HTTP protocol is port 80 for unencrypted connections and port 443 for encrypted connections.

I rarely see a web server and a proxy server (as in different service daemons) run /on/ /the/ /same/ /system/. As such there is no conflict between ports on different systems / IPs.

The rare case where I do see a web server and a proxy server (still different service daemons) frequently are using different IPs. The proxy is usually listening on a globally routed IP while the web server is listening on the loopback IP.

Then there is the entire different class where the same daemon functions as the web server and the proxy server. Apache's HTTPD and Nginx immediately come to mind as fulfilling both functions.

So ... I feel like "de-conflicting ports" is as true as "having to have different IPs for different TLS certificates".

Also, FTP protocol (port 21) does not support proxying, and using FTP proxy usually involves hacks.

I completely disagree.

I've been using FTP through proxies for years. Firefox (and Thunderbird) has an option /specifically/ for using FTP through proxies. As depicted in the the picture of Firefox on the page that Rafael A. linked to.

All mainstream web browsers have had support for proxying FTP traffic for (at least) 15 of the last 25 years. Up to the point that they started removing FTP protocol support from the browser.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux