On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 13:48 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > That statement does not compute in the current context: A transparent > proxy has many disadvantages over a forward/explicit proxy, Sure. But it has advantages also. > but both > transparent and forward/explicit proxies have approximately the same > support for HTTPS. In other words, if you find a forward/explicit > proxy > useful for HTTPS, then a transparent proxy can be used similarly. And can be done *WITHOUT* doing a MitM attack on my users? Cheers, b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
