And no need to invent anything. Everything has already been invented. And it is called the invention Store-ID. You take it and write on the basis of all that is needed. I do not see any problem. 20.11.2016 17:45, --Ahmad-- пишет: > hey guys . > > as long as the video cache has been opened now and in past proved its strength with http other websites for video . > > ((lets put youtube away now .)) > > > why don’t we see development on it to support the video contents of websites that support http like daily motion and its sisters websites . > > > and why don’t we use certificates once development for youtube & Facebook ??? > > > i saw the development of eleizer of caching windows updates and it was great solution ….. why don’t we combine those 2 solution in 1 product ? > > > i think that continuing on the solution of video cache is better than inventing solution from scratch . > > thanks again squid users Guys > >> On Nov 20, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The cachevideos solution is not a fake but as Amos mentioned it might not have been updated\upgraded to match today state of YouTube and google videos. >> I do not know a thing about this product but they offer a trial period and they have a forums which can be used to get more details. >> I believe they still have something really good in their solution since it's not based on StoreID but on other concepts. >> >> Eliezer >> >> ---- >> Eliezer Croitoru >> Linux System Administrator >> Mobile: +972-5-28704261 >> Email: eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yuri Voinov [mailto:yvoinov@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 00:18 >> To: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: caching videos over https? >> >> >> >> 20.11.2016 3:59, Eliezer Croitoru пишет: >>> Yuri, >>> >>> I am not the most experienced in life and in security but I can say it's possible and I am not selling it.... >>> I released the windows update cacher which works in enough places(just by seeing how many downloaded it..). >>> The first rule I have learned from my mentors is that even if you know something it might not fit to be in a form that the general public should know about. >>> I am looking for a link to CVE related publication rules of thumb so I would be able to understand better what should be published and how. >>> Any redirections are welcomed.. >>> >>> A note: >>> If you have the plain html of a json which contains the next links you would be able to predict couple things... >> I know what are you talking about. I came to this idea two years ago. >> Unfortunately, I had more important priorities. >> But I'm not seen open source solutions uses real YT internals yet and really works. >> >> Now I'm working on another squid's thing, but plan to return to YT store-ID helper later. >> >> However, it is only the fact that the "solutions" that are in the public domain, or obsolete, or are worthless. >> >> And for some more money and asking. I would understand if they really worked. Unfortunately, Google does not idiots work. >> >> That's why I said that the development of the Indian - fake. >>> If you would be able to catch every single fedora\redhat sqlite db file and replace it with a malicious sha256 data you would be able to hack each of their clients machine when they will be updated. >>> If you believe you can coordinate such a thing you are way above StoreID level of understanding networking and Computer Science. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Eliezer >>> >>> ---- >>> Eliezer Croitoru >>> Linux System Administrator >>> Mobile: +972-5-28704261 >>> Email: eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Yuri Voinov [mailto:yvoinov@xxxxxxxxx] >>> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 23:08 >>> To: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; >>> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: caching videos over https? >>> >>> I do not want to waste my and your time and discuss this issue. I know what I know, I have seriously studied this issue. None of those who are really able to cache Youtube - not only on desktops but also on mobile devices - all without exception - is no solution in the form of open source or blob will not offer free. This is big money. As for Google, and for those who use it. Therefore, I suggest better acquainted with the way Youtube counteracts caching and close useless discussion. >>> >>> I'm not going to shake the air and talk about what I do not and can not be. If you have a solution - really works, and for absolutely any type of client (Android and iPhone) - show evidence or let's stop blah-blah-blah. I mean, if you really were a solution - you'd sold it for money. But you do not have it, isn't it? >>> >>> Personally, I do not want anything. This is not the solution I'm looking for. >>> >>> For myself, I found a workaround; what I know - I have stated in the wiki. If someone else wants to spend a year or two for new investigations - welcome. >>> >>> 20.11.2016 2:45, Eliezer Croitoru пишет: >>>> Yuri, >>>> >>>> Let say I can cache youtube videos, what would I get for this? >>>> I mean, what would anyone get from this? >>>> Let say I will give you a blob that will work, will you try it? Or >>>> would you want only an open source solution? >>>> >>>> Eliezer >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> Eliezer Croitoru <http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/> Linux System >>>> Administrator >>>> Mobile: +972-5-28704261 >>>> Email: eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>>> On Behalf Of Yuri Voinov >>>> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 17:54 >>>> To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: Re: caching videos over https? >>>> >>>> HTTPS is not a problem, if not a problem to install the proxy >>>> certificate to the clients. >>>> The problem in combating caching YT by Google. >>>> >>>> 19.11.2016 21:41, Yuri Voinov пишет: >>>> >>>> >>>> 19.11.2016 21:35, Amos Jeffries пишет: >>>> 19.11.2016 20:56, Bakhtiyor Homidov пишет: >>>> thanks, yuri, >>>> >>>> just found https://cachevideos.com/, what do you think about this? >>>> >>>> On 20/11/2016 4:17 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: >>>> This is fake. >>>> >>>> Only for strange definitions of "fake". >>>> >>>> It is simply an old helper from before YouTube became all-HTTPS. It >>>> should still work okay for any of the video sites that are still >>>> using HTTP. >>>> YT uses cache-preventing scheme for videos relatively long time >>>> (after they finished use Flash videos). So, no one - excluding Google >>>> itself >>>> - can cache it now. Especially for mobile devices. I've spent last >>>> two years to learn this. So, anyone who talk he can cache YT is lies. >>>> >>>> As I explain here why: >>>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Dis >>>> c >>>> ussion >>>> >>>> All another videos - well, this is a bit difficult - but possible to cache. >>>> >>>> >>>> If you look at the features list it clearly says: >>>> "No support for HTTPS (secure HTTP) caching." >>>> HTTPS itself in most cases can't be easy cached by vanilla squid. >>>> >>>> >>>> Amos >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> squid-users mailing list >>>> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >>>> >> -- >> Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -- Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
