HTTPS is not a problem, if not a problem to install the proxy
certificate to the clients.
The problem in combating caching YT by Google.
19.11.2016 21:41, Yuri Voinov пишет:
19.11.2016 21:35, Amos Jeffries
пишет:
19.11.2016 20:56, Bakhtiyor Homidov пишет:
thanks, yuri,
just found https://cachevideos.com/, what do you think about this?
On 20/11/2016 4:17 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote:
This is fake.
Only for strange definitions of "fake".
It is simply an old helper from before YouTube became all-HTTPS. It
should still work okay for any of the video sites that are still using HTTP.
YT uses cache-preventing scheme for videos relatively long time
(after they finished use Flash videos). So, no one - excluding
Google itself - can cache it now. Especially for mobile devices.
I've spent last two years to learn this. So, anyone who talk he
can cache YT is lies.
As I explain here why: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Discussion
All another videos - well, this is a bit difficult - but possible
to cache.
If you look at the features list it clearly says:
"No support for HTTPS (secure HTTP) caching."
HTTPS itself in most cases can't be easy cached by vanilla squid.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
--
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.
--
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.
|
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users