I do not want to waste my and your time and discuss this issue. I know what I know, I have seriously studied this issue. None of those who are really able to cache Youtube - not only on desktops but also on mobile devices - all without exception - is no solution in the form of open source or blob will not offer free. This is big money. As for Google, and for those who use it. Therefore, I suggest better acquainted with the way Youtube counteracts caching and close useless discussion. I'm not going to shake the air and talk about what I do not and can not be. If you have a solution - really works, and for absolutely any type of client (Android and iPhone) - show evidence or let's stop blah-blah-blah. I mean, if you really were a solution - you'd sold it for money. But you do not have it, isn't it? Personally, I do not want anything. This is not the solution I'm looking for. For myself, I found a workaround; what I know - I have stated in the wiki. If someone else wants to spend a year or two for new investigations - welcome. 20.11.2016 2:45, Eliezer Croitoru пишет: > Yuri, > > Let say I can cache youtube videos, what would I get for this? > I mean, what would anyone get from this? > Let say I will give you a blob that will work, will you try it? Or would > you want only an open source solution? > > Eliezer > > ---- > Eliezer Croitoru <http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/> > Linux System Administrator > Mobile: +972-5-28704261 > Email: eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Yuri Voinov > Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 17:54 > To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: caching videos over https? > > HTTPS is not a problem, if not a problem to install the proxy certificate > to the clients. > The problem in combating caching YT by Google. > > 19.11.2016 21:41, Yuri Voinov пишет: > > > 19.11.2016 21:35, Amos Jeffries пишет: > 19.11.2016 20:56, Bakhtiyor Homidov пишет: > thanks, yuri, > > just found https://cachevideos.com/, what do you think about this? > > On 20/11/2016 4:17 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > This is fake. > > Only for strange definitions of "fake". > > It is simply an old helper from before YouTube became all-HTTPS. It > should still work okay for any of the video sites that are still using > HTTP. > YT uses cache-preventing scheme for videos relatively long time (after they > finished use Flash videos). So, no one - excluding Google itself - can cache > it now. Especially for mobile devices. I've spent last two years to learn > this. So, anyone who talk he can cache YT is lies. > > As I explain here why: > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Discussion > > All another videos - well, this is a bit difficult - but possible to cache. > > > If you look at the features list it clearly says: > "No support for HTTPS (secure HTTP) caching." > HTTPS itself in most cases can't be easy cached by vanilla squid. > > > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > -- Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
