Search squid archive

Re: AUFS vs. DISKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Your are right fred,
> 
> It is is a difficult deal for us too...
> 
> aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()",
> HTTP
> reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with
> squid
> crashes ( watchdog)


You mean "rock store" or aufs ? 
For me aufs seems stable too but slower than diskd after a point, something like beyond 400 r/s 

Rock store was very unstable -> Again, my tests are not very recent, do you make a try with 3.5.x ? 

I found this, my exact value was --with-aufs-threads=128, but "squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion" was just less present ...

> 
> diskd -> more stable but slower...
> 
> 

Very very stable, no error, no warning 

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux