> Your are right fred, > > It is is a difficult deal for us too... > > aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()", > HTTP > reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with > squid > crashes ( watchdog) You mean "rock store" or aufs ? For me aufs seems stable too but slower than diskd after a point, something like beyond 400 r/s Rock store was very unstable -> Again, my tests are not very recent, do you make a try with 3.5.x ? I found this, my exact value was --with-aufs-threads=128, but "squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion" was just less present ... > > diskd -> more stable but slower... > > Very very stable, no error, no warning _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
