-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 15.07.15 17:18, FredB пишет: > >> Your are right fred, >> >> It is is a difficult deal for us too... >> >> aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()", >> HTTP >> reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with >> squid >> crashes ( watchdog) > > > You mean "rock store" or aufs ? > For me aufs seems stable too but slower than diskd after a point, something like beyond 400 r/s > > Rock store was very unstable -> Again, my tests are not very recent, do you make a try with 3.5.x ? > > I found this, my exact value was --with-aufs-threads=128, but "squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion" was just less present ... > >> >> diskd -> more stable but slower... Just use fast separate physical devices on separate controllers - and all will be ok without any delays. >> >> >> > > Very very stable, no error, no warning > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpkIfAAoJENNXIZxhPexGwZ4H/ikmHKulsvCaAp/0tYjheqzM CuaFKSi0ZB+E4a/mX9SbfkXkU+M/soVmZoz0pMVZTOH/EzpfQuRTbWcK7AMBda7v N7lyblQuDlqlJHWxE2KbKnRg5EYKSgSBusPrCeVsIfml2jHdkUXnS5XukcofQlwE CFFGNTMVVZVxPZJLM8INwDUoSY2nH9xVp64oKp6CEU5nmsbSQ0yVUymCK6FPga51 xJnGj0R92pHgQcQSdKjvXSFVL3i1AdRex2hbJhwobQl4pEdFnUoVbZ4xNBtWB/eY g4aUNTEHoCIUQm+3LBO1nNks6VQ+gGwJDmZ2fOGNn2VgDOINUPx4i4ZKZn0c6rY= =bVts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
