Search squid archive

Re: AUFS vs. DISKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Your are right fred,

It is is a difficult deal for us too...

aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()", HTTP reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with squid crashes ( watchdog)

diskd -> more stable but slower...



Le 15/07/2015 12:46, FredB a écrit :
Just a little word about aufs, just for information, to avoid

squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion


I had increase this value (sorry I can't remember the exact number)

       --with-aufs-threads=xxx

But the "load average" - top counter - was very important and I should back to diskd
So only diskd could works good (rock store was worst than aufs ...), with my load and my usage, but perhaps I should test with a more recent version

Tested on Debian
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux