Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote > Hey dr, > > On 11/12/13 10:24, Dr.x wrote: >> >> and again , here , im asking Amos about SMP>>>>> >> >> can we after using SMP to get more BW saving ?? assume we fixed all other >> parameters of squid and want to make comparison . > I am not sure I understand your question. > >> assume i have server without smp and save about 40 MBps >> >> can i reach this value after SMP ??? > > From the question My only conclusion is that the complexity of SMP was > not understood yet. > > Squid is a single process application. > In 3.2 what we try to do is to let the admin configure a cache service > using the basic single process idea while extending the configuration to > allow pre-defining of multi process squid service. > > Each and every squid instance can and should communicate with other > instances in order to achieve the result which is MutliCPU utilization. > > I would try to say that looking at squid instances is more like "how do > I configure a cluster of squids?" > > Once the understanding of how a cluster should be configured the answer > to your question will be answered in a sec. > > All the bests, > Eliezer but i think i have a good understanding of smp squid , " u may understood me " why i asked that is , because i am talkign about maximum object size is 32 k thats why i think that hit ration and bw saving in smp will be less that normal squid . and agian , this is just a questionnaire agian , eleizer , thanks for your reply reagrds ----- Dr.x -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/how-to-use-multi-instances-SMP-in-squid-tp4663724p4663783.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
