acl rutube dstdomain .rutube.ru .vk.com .vkontakte.ru acl rutube_streams rep_header Content-Type -i application/x-shockwave-flash http_reply_access deny rutube rutube_streams acl rutube_Files url_regex -i \player.swf$ http_access deny rutube rutube_Files But there is still question - how cut off .iflv instead of cutting player.swf? 2012/3/16 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 16/03/2012 8:08 a.m., awarecons wrote: >> >> Suddenly it turned out that it's impossible to deny video from >> www.rutube.ru by Squid means. There is the only intend to cut off >> video, not shockwave nor java-scripts. > > > Impossible? Looks very possible from that snippet you give below... > > >> >> Rutube.ru uses inframe incapsulation of video via java-script. Example: >> http://rutube.ru/tracks/4567054.html >> piece of code: >> <script type="text/javascript"> >> var rt_referer = escape(location.href); playMovie('pid', >> >> 'http://rutube.ru/player.swf?buffer_first=1.0&file=http%3A%2F%2Fbl.rutube.ru%2Fdb9decb3ae2341724c72e6490b028cfd.iflv&xurl=http%3A%2F%2Frutube.ru%2Ftrackinfo%2Fdb9decb3ae2341724c72e6490b028cfd.html%3Fad_ids%3D&image=http%3A%2F%2Ftub.rutube.ru%2Fthumbs%2Fdb%2F9d%2Fdb9decb3ae2341724c72e6490b028cfd-1.jpg&&autoload=true&fsb=true&logo=false&newWnd=false&rAngle=0&uid=3692805&referer=' >> + rt_referer); >> </script> >> >> So it freely passes through rep_mime_type, rep_header, url_regex (). > > > The first two yes possibly. But regex can catch anything, that is both its > benefit and part of the price. If you are not catching it with regex then > your regex rule is wrong. > > A urlpath_regex for "^/player\.swf" can catch these videos when paired with > a dstdomain ACL for rutube.ru. > > >> >> Please, give me solution how Squid and/or SquidGuard could cut off >> video, not disabling access to site itself. Approach is to deny video >> content, not site itself. >> >> NB Using rep_mime_type, rep_header, url_regex works fine with >> youtube.com - it lets to download shockwave player, but player is >> unable to download and play video. > > > rutube.ru is not youtube.com. They have different owners, different authors, > and different URL patterns. Expecting them to behave exactly the same? > > Amos
