On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:59:29 +1300 Amos Jeffries wrote: > They are using a standard cache_peer parent relationship to fetch > MISS traffic through a second filtering proxy of their own design. > There is no bypass of Squid happening. But I wonder what accounts for the OPs statement: On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:21:33 -0700 - Mikael - wrote: > > I tested this and that implementation really, really speeds things > > up. I'm wondering if perhaps the squids were cleared between tests, but the parent cache was left, giving Untangle an unfair advantage. Or is it really faster?
