Have you tried unchecking on your browser configuration "Use HTTP 1.1 when connecting thru proxy"? About avoiding the proxy-cache for special sites, the only way I know is to put exceptions on the client browser config. You can do this with GPO also. On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Joar Jegleim <joar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > thnx for your reply Matus > > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> On 27.11.08 15:02, Joar Jegleim wrote: >>> I've been debugging a problem with a soap app (cognos planning) which >>> brakes when being run through our squid 3.0 proxy . >> >>> After tcpdumping the whole session and investigating with wireshark it >>> seems to me that the following happens >>> 1. client performs a 'GET' in HTTP 1.1 to the proxy >>> 2. the proxy then performs this GET against the app server, but now it's >>> in HTTP 1.0 >> >> Yes, because squid only supports HTTP/1.0 >> >>> 3. the app server replies in HTTP 1.1 which in turn squid >> >> The application is broken, because it must not answer in HTTP/1.1 for >> HTTP/1.0 request > further investigation shows that a HTTP/1.1 request from the client is > stopped at squid with a 411 error in access.log. This request never > reaches the app server. I suspect the client using chunked encoding and > squid replies with a 411 'try again with content length'. > >> >>> 2.: I thought by configuring squid to 'always_direct' sessions to the >>> app server that squid is transparent in between the client and the app >>> server. As of now it seems to me that, even with bypassing squid, squid >>> fiddles with the HTTP version in the GET's being performed resulting in >>> the application breaking. E.G. to make this work the application must >>> be rewritten to support giving 'content length' in those GET's where >>> squid gives a 411 >> >> you aren't bypassing squid with always_direct. the always_direct is SQUID >> directive not to use any parent proxies, but the squid is already processing >> the request. > > ok, but is there any directive in squid to just pass on requests without > changing the original request ? > > > regards > Joar Jegleim >
