Henrik Nordstrom disse na ultima mensagem: > On tor, 2007-08-09 at 10:18 -0700, Nicole wrote: >> As some have pointed out, it's a shame diskd is horked, since it seemed >> to be nice and fast. > > Well, it's been broken for several years now, an no one has been willing > to commit any resources to get it fixed. > please be a little bit more specific about "comitting resources", what do you exactly mean? what is what you agree to be broken beyond the shutdown issue? >> However, since I have not heard of any progress on fixing >> the bug, I am curious what others have been using or prefer as their >> alternative to diskd and why? > > aufs is seen as the best alternative currently, with FreeBSD also > supporting kernel threads. > > Note: running aufs without kernel threads is a dead end and won't > perform well, you might just as well run with the ufs cache_dir type > then. > ok you mean threads instead of pthreads right? Michel ... **************************************************** Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais. ****************************************************
