On tor, 2007-08-09 at 10:18 -0700, Nicole wrote: > As some have pointed out, it's a shame diskd is horked, since it seemed > to be nice and fast. Well, it's been broken for several years now, an no one has been willing to commit any resources to get it fixed. > However, since I have not heard of any progress on fixing > the bug, I am curious what others have been using or prefer as their > alternative to diskd and why? aufs is seen as the best alternative currently, with FreeBSD also supporting kernel threads. Note: running aufs without kernel threads is a dead end and won't perform well, you might just as well run with the ufs cache_dir type then. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
