Search squid archive

Re: My squid is slower than apache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



These numbers appear to indicate that Squid is nearly as fast as
Apache serving up static content, which is pretty much exactly what I
would expect.

The very high 'max' field suggests that the total is being skewed by
one very slow transaction, both for Apache (3 seconds) and then even
more so for Squid (5 seconds)?

Apache only:
. . .
Connection Times (ms)
            min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        0    2  42.4      2    3001
Processing:     2   10   2.0     11      71
Waiting:          0    2   1.0      2      65
Total:              3   13  42.4     13    3013
. . .
Squid with Apache:
. . .
Connection Times (ms)
            min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:         0    1  26.9      1    3003
Processing:     1   14  65.2     14    5024
Waiting:          0    3  65.0      3    5011
Total:              3   16  70.4     15    5025


Words of wisdom:
On 7/19/07, Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 If you're benchmarking apache vs squid
for static content then you're going to lose out.

Kevin

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux