On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, Edinilson J. Santos wrote: > I'm using tproxy with the following configuration (without problems): Would you be willing to draw up a diagram and post your configuration into the Wiki? I'm trying to put together a bunch of example squid configurations and performance reports. http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/ I believe. thanks! Adrian > > Dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz, 4gb RAM, 2 SCSI 72gb 160mb/s > Debian with Kernel 2.6.18 + tproxy for this kernel > Squid 2.6 Stable 5 compiled with the following options: > Squid Cache: Version 2.6.STABLE5 > configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid' > '--enable-storeio=coss,ufs,aufs' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap' > '--enable-snmp' '--enable-default-err-language=Portuguese' > '--enable-linux-netfilter' '--disable-hostname-checks' > '--enable-underscores' '--enable-epoll' '--enable-linux-tproxy' > '--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-coss-aio-ops' > '--with-large-files' > > Edinilson > --------------------------------------------------------- > ATINET-Professional Web Hosting > Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 > http://www.atinet.com.br > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Alexandre Correa" <alexandre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:08 AM > Subject: Re: tproxy performance overhead ? > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Alexandre Correa wrote: > > tproxy not work for me > > > > my four proxies servers using kernel compiled with tproxy, 64 bits for > > EMT64 ... server crash after 3 hours +- .... kernel 2.6.18.5 > > You're going to have to be a little more specific with "server crash". > > Does anyone have tproxy working on this kind of configuration? > > > > > Adrian > > -- > - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid > Support - > -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level bandwidth-capped VPSes available in WA -
