Search squid archive

Re: tproxy performance overhead ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm using tproxy with the following configuration (without problems):

Dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz, 4gb RAM, 2 SCSI 72gb 160mb/s
Debian with Kernel 2.6.18 + tproxy for this kernel
Squid 2.6 Stable 5 compiled with the following options:
Squid Cache: Version 2.6.STABLE5
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid' 
'--enable-storeio=coss,ufs,aufs' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap' 
'--enable-snmp' '--enable-default-err-language=Portuguese' 
'--enable-linux-netfilter' '--disable-hostname-checks' 
'--enable-underscores' '--enable-epoll' '--enable-linux-tproxy' 
'--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-coss-aio-ops' 
'--with-large-files'

Edinilson
---------------------------------------------------------
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Alexandre Correa" <alexandre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:08 AM
Subject: Re:  tproxy performance overhead ?


On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Alexandre Correa wrote:
> tproxy not work for me
>
> my four proxies servers using kernel compiled with tproxy, 64 bits for
> EMT64 ... server crash after 3 hours +- .... kernel 2.6.18.5

You're going to have to be a little more specific with "server crash".

Does anyone have tproxy working on this kind of configuration?




Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid 
Support -



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux