On Wed, Dec 06, 2006, Pranav Desai wrote: > Hello All, > > Does anyone have any numbers on how much overhead tproxy will add ? > Basically, how much drop in performance would we see if tproxy is > enabled. > > I imagine that tproxy will have to do some lookup and hence should > incur some overhead. > I also looked at the tproxy mailing list > https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/tproxy/2005-February/000167.html > and it seems to suggest that tproxy is not doing very well. > > I am also trying a setup myself. > > (192.168.1.201) > client ----------- proxy ----------- server (10.51.6.197) > eth0 (10.51.6.102) > eth1 (192.168.1.102) > > * There is no direct link between the server and the client. > * The servers' default gw is the proxy, and the proxy has forwading on. > * Polymix4 running on the client & server. > * I dont have any sticky load balancer or routers, hence i am doing this > setup. That sounds about right. Just have the proxy as the default gateway for the client and server. Adrian -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -