On 10/24/06, Mark Elsen <mark.elsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And it doesn't get cached? Sorry if i'm missing something. > > Whether it's get cached is unrelated to the redirector story; it depends on the freshness parameters of the particular object being fetched by squid from the remote webserver : http://www.ircache.net/cgi-bin/cacheability.py
I see what you're indicating now. So if the ultimate redirect "should be cacheable" (according to caching law!) then it will be cached by Squid? So why am i not seeing that behaviour with the redirector?
M.