On 26.05 17:40, Abu Khaled wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:40:06 +0300
> From: Abu Khaled <khaled.abu@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] show ips going outside squid
>
> On 5/26/05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Ronny wrote:
> > > >Hi all am running transparent proxy on squid 2.5Stable7 but would like
> >
> > let's call it intercepting proxy.
>
> What happend to the "Transparent Proxy" term. I have been using Squid
> for 3 years now and it was always called "Transparent Proxy".
by a mistake. See RFC 2616:
A
"transparent proxy" is a proxy that does not modify the request or
response beyond what is required for proxy authentication and
identification. A "non-transparent proxy" is a proxy that modifies
the request or response in order to provide some added service to
the user agent, such as group annotation services, media type
transformation, protocol reduction, or anonymity filtering. Except
where either transparent or non-transparent behavior is explicitly
stated, the HTTP proxy requirements apply to both types of
proxies.
> After
> subscribing to the mailling list all repiles to "Transparent Proxy"
> are answered "Intercepting Proxy". I wonder why ?!
because "intercapting proxy" is the right term.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
