Re: [squid-users] what the difference b/w htcp / proxy only

[Askar <askar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Elsen Marc wrote:

> > ...
> > ...
> >
> > cache_peer Mysecondcache sibling 3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
> > 3128 4827 htcp proxy-only
> >
> > you mean its of no benefit to specify
> >
> > 3128 4827 htcp proxy-only 
> >
> > while configureing cache_peer?
> >
> >
> >    
>
>  - Depends on your requirements ; htcp is a more advanced inter cache
> protocol then ICP.
>
>  - proxy-only specifies that objects from the remote cache should not be saved
> locally.
>
> So, if you need those : the question is the reverse. Why do you think
> that is a better situation for you ?
>
> M.
>
>
>  
Frankly I really don't know if htcp is better then ICP while configuring 
sibling, all we want to achieve "sibling" and yes "proxy-only" would be 
the best coz all of the caches servers are on the same network/switch.

I thinks there is some sorta lack of communication probably from my side 
coz I'm not native ya ;)

So what you suggest may I use ICP or HTCP protocol while configuring 
cache_peer , sibling relationship b/w the cache servers.


Thanks and regards

Askar