>... >... > Frankly I really don't know if htcp is better then ICP while > configuring HTCP provides better security and better cache hit predictions versus ICP. However, HTCP messages are larger and more complicated. So they impose slightly more network overhead. > sibling, all we want to achieve "sibling" and yes > "proxy-only" would be > the best coz all of the caches servers are on the same network/switch. > > I thinks there is some sorta lack of communication probably > from my side > coz I'm not native ya ;) > > So what you suggest may I use ICP or HTCP protocol while configuring > cache_peer , sibling relationship b/w the cache servers. > You need ICP or HTCP to use siblings in a fashionable manner. I.e. the ability for the cache 'client' to ask the sibling whether it has the object or not. Probably ICP will has a slighty more chance for 'false hits'. M.
