Any particular reason why you're after DR mode? I have several squids load balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most sites can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server. You have to do some monkey patching to get DR mode to work; I personally think unless one can show performance limitations on why you should go that route, it is an unnecessary complexity. Andrew -- Zope Managed Hosting Systems Administrator/Software Engineer Zope Corporation (540) 361-1700 > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:11 AM > To: Askar > Cc: Squid Users > Subject: Re: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Askar wrote: > > > and yes all the caches are on the same switch, and we will also put the > LVS > > Director on the same switch with cache servers. > > I thinks LVS/DR is what we have to go for ? :) sorry for my stupid > question > > again and again > > Yes. > > To make this setup simpler the LVS should have three network interfaces > > 1: Client network > > 2: Internet > > 3: Cache servers > > or alternatively two > > 1: Client Network > > 2: Internet + Cache Servers > > > > Using DR with the cache servers on the same network segment as the client > network is a bit tricky. Not if you only do interception, but if you want > to provide a proxy address as well (recommended). > > Regards > Henrik
