Re: Proposal: review branches (was Re: [vdagent-win PATCH v6 2/5] Initial rewrite of image conversion code)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:51:37AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > About the "consistently use Reviewed-by" this is already been proved
> > > to be not possible in our team. We use patchwork but we can't say we
> > > use consistently these replies, lot of the times they came in different
> > > format.
> > 
> > I'm never looking at patchworks, so won't notice that missing r-b are
> > causing issues :) Maybe it's possible to make a team effort to be more
> > consistent here?
> > 
> > Christophe
> > 
> 
> Yes and no, I think tools should help not slow down.
> Take as example my recent "README" series. 6 patches quite small
> and simple. Hit reply, "ack to series", send. That is.

If patchwork were able to detect series which have been pushed, and hide
them, then this workflow would be perfectly fine.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]