> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:51:37AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > About the "consistently use Reviewed-by" this is already been proved > > to be not possible in our team. We use patchwork but we can't say we > > use consistently these replies, lot of the times they came in different > > format. > > I'm never looking at patchworks, so won't notice that missing r-b are > causing issues :) Maybe it's possible to make a team effort to be more > consistent here? > > Christophe > Yes and no, I think tools should help not slow down. Take as example my recent "README" series. 6 patches quite small and simple. Hit reply, "ack to series", send. That is. Following the tool (patchwork) would require to reply to all patch mail, adding an "Acked-by: Name Surname <email>" and send. Somebody could argue that with the web PR on Gitlab you could just hit "merge" and you don't even need to push the patches manually. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel