Re: Proposal: review branches (was Re: [vdagent-win PATCH v6 2/5] Initial rewrite of image conversion code)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:51:37AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> About the "consistently use Reviewed-by" this is already been proved
> to be not possible in our team. We use patchwork but we can't say we
> use consistently these replies, lot of the times they came in different
> format.

I'm never looking at patchworks, so won't notice that missing r-b are
causing issues :) Maybe it's possible to make a team effort to be more
consistent here?

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]