Re: Proposal: review branches (was Re: [vdagent-win PATCH v6 2/5] Initial rewrite of image conversion code)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

----- Original Message -----
> Now, any objection to
> 
> 1. Recommending that we use git URLs in patches?

If that may help, but as Christophe said, this may be overkill for small series. Let's not make it a rule.

> 2. Having a shared location for branches under review?

This is really contrary to the distributed nature of git.

Add a remote remote repo if you are interested by tracking someone else work, it works just as well.

Imho, we could benefit using a system tracking patch series state from the mailing list, such as patchew. But it would probably need some work to fit Spice needs.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]