pushed thanks On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/07/2015 07:27 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> The SPICE protocol uses XT (set 1) scancodes, not AT (set 2) scancodes. >> >> Right, it's XT (set 1). I think it's all also commonly called AT set 1 >> though (at least in keymap.csv ;) > > > Works for me. > >>> spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of AT scancodes, which >>> are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode(). >> >> s/AT/XT :) > > > Whoops! Revised message: > > "AT scancodes" implies AT set 2, but the SPICE protocol expects > AT set 1. spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of > set 1 scancodes, which are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode(). > > Thanks, > --Benjamin Gilbert > -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel