On 01/07/2015 07:27 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The SPICE protocol uses XT (set 1) scancodes, not AT (set 2) scancodes.
Right, it's XT (set 1). I think it's all also commonly called AT set 1
though (at least in keymap.csv ;)
Works for me.
spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of AT scancodes, which
are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().
s/AT/XT :)
Whoops! Revised message:
"AT scancodes" implies AT set 2, but the SPICE protocol expects
AT set 1. spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of
set 1 scancodes, which are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().
Thanks,
--Benjamin Gilbert
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel