On 06/16/2014 04:16 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > > On 06/09/2014 09:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>> On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >>>> On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>>>> Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. >>>>> Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and >>>>> effort. >>>>> >>>>> a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a >>>>> month/some >>>>> timeframe" >>>>> b) "There's an SEP field on these problems, everyone who understands >>>>> that code has moved on" >>>>> c) "Go away" >>>>> d) "Oops, I've been meaning to get back to you but I keep >>>>> forgetting and >>>>> life is hectic..." >>>>> e) "Didn't you hear? SPICE is dead." >>>>> f) "Other." Please elaborate using the space provided below: >>>> The first patch looks good (just adjusting the #if to disable the >>>> print). I'll pick it up, thanks, you deserved a faster response. >>>> >>>> No idea what SEP is. >>> Hi Alon, >>> >>> I followed Marc-André's advice and sent these out to DRI ond xorg >>> mailing lists, respectively. The qxl.ko patch was picked up by Dave >>> Airlie and committed to drm-next branch. >>> >>> The second is still without a home. >>> >>> (BTW: An SEP is a "somebody else's problem" effect, see >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody_Else%27s_Problem, popularized in >>> Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide novel. Very funny concept.) >> Missed that. >> >>> Any possibility of help with issue #2, the xorg-devel list is silent on >>> this one and I don't know who the maintainer is specifically. Without >>> this patch xorg-qxl is trivially crashable when using dual head at >>> 1920x1200 resolution (or potentially lower resolution). >>> >> 96 relocs with 512x512 chunks - what do you do to crash it? >> >> Soren Sandmann is the maintainer, but I did a release once, I can commit >> it once I'm done testing (need to allow large resolutions which by >> default are limited to surface0_area_size). > > Good morning (evening?) Alon, > > Anything else you need from me on this? I've attached the patch from > git-format-patch that should have all of the correct signed-off etc. and > a proper commit description. > > Just a friendly ping. > Thanks. I pushed your patch (plus just a white space fix). It is still not testable without changing the surface0 allocation manually or enabling surface resizing. Have you taken a look perhaps at the surface resize stuff? how did you test it so far? _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel