Re: [PATCH 0/2] stability for dual head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote:
Bump. I'll make it easy.  This is a multiple choice response form.
Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort.

a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a month/some
timeframe"
b) "There's an SEP field on these problems, everyone who understands
that code has moved on"
c) "Go away"
d) "Oops, I've been meaning to get back to you but I keep forgetting and
life is hectic..."
e) "Didn't you hear? SPICE is dead."
f) "Other." Please elaborate using the space provided below:
The first patch looks good (just adjusting the #if to disable the
print). I'll pick it up, thanks, you deserved a faster response.

No idea what SEP is.

Hi Alon,

I followed Marc-André's advice and sent these out to DRI ond xorg mailing lists, respectively. The qxl.ko patch was picked up by Dave Airlie and committed to drm-next branch.

The second is still without a home.

(BTW: An SEP is a "somebody else's problem" effect, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody_Else%27s_Problem, popularized in Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide novel. Very funny concept.)

Any possibility of help with issue #2, the xorg-devel list is silent on this one and I don't know who the maintainer is specifically. Without this patch xorg-qxl is trivially crashable when using dual head at 1920x1200 resolution (or potentially lower resolution).

--
Thanks,
David Mansfield
Cobite, INC.

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]