On 06/09/2014 04:18 PM, David Mansfield wrote: > > On 06/09/2014 07:18 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >> On 06/03/2014 04:14 PM, David Mansfield wrote: >>> Bump. I'll make it easy. This is a multiple choice response form. >>> Anyone reading this can respond with one letter so save time and effort. >>> >>> a) "We're too busy with RHEL 7/paying clients, come back in a month/some >>> timeframe" >>> b) "There's an SEP field on these problems, everyone who understands >>> that code has moved on" >>> c) "Go away" >>> d) "Oops, I've been meaning to get back to you but I keep forgetting and >>> life is hectic..." >>> e) "Didn't you hear? SPICE is dead." >>> f) "Other." Please elaborate using the space provided below: >> The first patch looks good (just adjusting the #if to disable the >> print). I'll pick it up, thanks, you deserved a faster response. >> >> No idea what SEP is. > > Hi Alon, > > I followed Marc-André's advice and sent these out to DRI ond xorg > mailing lists, respectively. The qxl.ko patch was picked up by Dave > Airlie and committed to drm-next branch. > > The second is still without a home. > > (BTW: An SEP is a "somebody else's problem" effect, see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody_Else%27s_Problem, popularized in > Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide novel. Very funny concept.) Missed that. > > Any possibility of help with issue #2, the xorg-devel list is silent on > this one and I don't know who the maintainer is specifically. Without > this patch xorg-qxl is trivially crashable when using dual head at > 1920x1200 resolution (or potentially lower resolution). > 96 relocs with 512x512 chunks - what do you do to crash it? Soren Sandmann is the maintainer, but I did a release once, I can commit it once I'm done testing (need to allow large resolutions which by default are limited to surface0_area_size). _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel