Re: [PATCH spice-gtk] pulse: do not abort on corking no stream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:41:27AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:33:52PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > >> Check that there is an actual stream before calling cork().
> > > >
> > > > Is it expected that we are getting called with a non-NULL stream in the
> > > > first place?
> > > 
> > > Since this is sent by server on mjpeg stream creation, I would say
> > > playback stream isn't mandatory.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, it should not crash.
> > 
> > Of course not, but we should fix things in the right place, hence the
> > question to know if this is the right place for that fix.
> > Your answer seems to be about playback_min_latency_changed(), what about
> > stream_uncork? Is this happening in the same situation?
> >
> 
> No, there are checks for stream presence (it was checked everywhere, only
> since efa65b49f it didn't check for min-latency property changes)

This belongs in the commit log imo, and I did not understand what the
g_return_if_fail is doing in that commit from your answer.

Christophe

Attachment: pgpgk8P_Z1HuV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]