On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:58:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/11/2012 04:45 PM, Jeremy White wrote: > >Forgive me if this is FAQ'd elsewhere, but I did not find it in a short > >hunt, and I'm curious. > > Documentation is not our strong point, help with that is greatly > appreciated :) > > >Who has commit access to the main trees, > > For all the repositories under http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/ > anyone who has a proven track record of being a team player and making > regular code contributions so far has been given direct commit / push > access. That currently means the entire Spice team @ Red Hat, and > Daniel P. Berrange have access (not sure if I'm missing someone ...) > > Note that since access is managed through a unix group, access to one > of them means access to all of them. > > > and how is the decision to > >commit made? > > For the above repositories in general the rule is send patches to > spice-devel, wait for review and revise on comments, or push on ack. > > I must admit that for the linux agent and usbredir I break the rules, > since the code is 99% mine, so I my own stuff I just push without > reviews... > > >But I also saw several patches appear in the xf86-video-qxl master > >branch, and I didn't see them show up anywhere in a mailing list. > > That falls under the xorg umbrella, so it has different rules / > a different mailinglist. Alon can probably fill you in on this. Soren has commit access to that, and I do too, and it's mostly review by subjecting it to the open air. If no one objects after a week, push it. Soren seems to push things directly without posting patches though. > > Regards, > > Hans > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel