Re: Development process?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 06/11/2012 04:45 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
Forgive me if this is FAQ'd elsewhere, but I did not find it in a short
hunt, and I'm curious.

Documentation is not our strong point, help with that is greatly
appreciated :)

Who has commit access to the main trees,

For all the repositories under http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/
anyone who has a proven track record of being a team player and making
regular code contributions so far has been given direct commit / push
access. That currently means the entire Spice team @ Red Hat, and
Daniel P. Berrange have access (not sure if I'm missing someone ...)

Note that since access is managed through a unix group, access to one
of them means access to all of them.

> and how is the decision to
commit made?

For the above repositories in general the rule is send patches to
spice-devel, wait for review and revise on comments, or push on ack.

I must admit that for the linux agent and usbredir I break the rules,
since the code is 99% mine, so I my own stuff I just push without
reviews...

But I also saw several patches appear in the xf86-video-qxl master
branch, and I didn't see them show up anywhere in a mailing list.

That falls under the xorg umbrella, so it has different rules /
a different mailinglist. Alon can probably fill you in on this.

Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]