On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:44:54PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 3/1/21 4:05 PM, Rob Gardner wrote:
> > On 3/1/21 5:56 AM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:09 AM Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> is_no_fault_exception() has two bugs which were discovered via random
> >>> opcode testing with stress-ng. Both are caused by improper filtering
> >>> of opcodes.
> >> Rob, tested on my ldom, works perfectly now...
> >>
> >> $ uname -a
> >> Linux ttip 5.12.0-rc1-dirty #195 SMP Mon Mar 1 15:46:15 MSK 2021
> >> sparc64 GNU/Linux
> >>
> >> $ stress-ng --opcode 1 --timeout 60 --metrics-brief
> >> stress-ng: info: [945] dispatching hogs: 1 opcode
> >> stress-ng: info: [945] successful run completed in 60.00s (1 min, 0.00 secs)
> >> stress-ng: info: [945] stressor bogo ops real time usr time
> >> sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
> >> stress-ng: info: [945] (secs) (secs)
> >> (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
> >> stress-ng: info: [945] opcode 17847 60.00 27.45
> >> 34.03 297.45 290.29
> >>
> >> Thank you for a quick fix.
> >
> >
> > You're welcome. Please add your "tested-by" if you like.
>
> Any chance we could get this patch into 5.12 and the stable kernels? (CC Greg)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
