Hi Greg! On 3/2/21 3:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On 3/1/21 4:05 PM, Rob Gardner wrote: >>> On 3/1/21 5:56 AM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:09 AM Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> is_no_fault_exception() has two bugs which were discovered via random >>>>> opcode testing with stress-ng. Both are caused by improper filtering >>>>> of opcodes. >>>> Rob, tested on my ldom, works perfectly now... >>>> >>>> $ uname -a >>>> Linux ttip 5.12.0-rc1-dirty #195 SMP Mon Mar 1 15:46:15 MSK 2021 >>>> sparc64 GNU/Linux >>>> >>>> $ stress-ng --opcode 1 --timeout 60 --metrics-brief >>>> stress-ng: info: [945] dispatching hogs: 1 opcode >>>> stress-ng: info: [945] successful run completed in 60.00s (1 min, 0.00 secs) >>>> stress-ng: info: [945] stressor bogo ops real time usr time >>>> sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s >>>> stress-ng: info: [945] (secs) (secs) >>>> (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) >>>> stress-ng: info: [945] opcode 17847 60.00 27.45 >>>> 34.03 297.45 290.29 >>>> >>>> Thank you for a quick fix. >>> >>> >>> You're welcome. Please add your "tested-by" if you like. >> >> Any chance we could get this patch into 5.12 and the stable kernels? (CC Greg) > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly. > > </formletter> Thanks for the heads-up. I'll leave it to Rob to decide when to send it. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
