Hi! On 3/1/21 4:05 PM, Rob Gardner wrote: > On 3/1/21 5:56 AM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:09 AM Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> is_no_fault_exception() has two bugs which were discovered via random >>> opcode testing with stress-ng. Both are caused by improper filtering >>> of opcodes. >> Rob, tested on my ldom, works perfectly now... >> >> $ uname -a >> Linux ttip 5.12.0-rc1-dirty #195 SMP Mon Mar 1 15:46:15 MSK 2021 >> sparc64 GNU/Linux >> >> $ stress-ng --opcode 1 --timeout 60 --metrics-brief >> stress-ng: info: [945] dispatching hogs: 1 opcode >> stress-ng: info: [945] successful run completed in 60.00s (1 min, 0.00 secs) >> stress-ng: info: [945] stressor bogo ops real time usr time >> sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s >> stress-ng: info: [945] (secs) (secs) >> (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time) >> stress-ng: info: [945] opcode 17847 60.00 27.45 >> 34.03 297.45 290.29 >> >> Thank you for a quick fix. > > > You're welcome. Please add your "tested-by" if you like. Any chance we could get this patch into 5.12 and the stable kernels? (CC Greg) Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
