On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300 > >>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. >>> >>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' >>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit >>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks! > > Thanks for testing Sergei. > Is that the line we're using now? I'm out of touch... Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
