> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. > > The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' > but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit > symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks! -- Sergei
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
