From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300 >> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. >> >> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' >> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit >> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. >> >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks! Thanks for testing Sergei. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
