Re: sparc - next unification bits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:37:15PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 14:59, Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As such, it may be beneficial to standardize around an interface
> > similar to sparc32's - i.e. a structure with ->foo() calls - and make
> > an implementation of this that uses sparc64's single function pointer.
> 
> I'm currently working on this idea and hope to have something to show
> in the next couple of days.
> 
> Sam, if you're already working on this, don't stop, you know what
> you're doing much better than I do. So, even if my code never leaves
> my computer, I'd rather do the work and know what I did wrong than
> prevent you getting it right the first time.

Hi Julian.

Please hack away - I look forward to see the patches.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux