tsepp2000@xxxxxx writes: > Thank you Mans, > > my question was a little more profound. I have linked 3 pictures that show > the difference between three of many ways. Some filters are also used > here. My question was about whether someone here has deeper experiences > and has also made listening comparisons about the highest quality command > for sox. The thread you linked is about conversion from PCM to DSD. > I could not attach my 3 example pictures (Spek): Every file 32 Bit Float, > Sox-files linear phase. Here the download-link: > https://www.file-upload.net/download-14089057/DSF2WAV.zip.html > The Spek-pictures: > - Xrecode3.png output 352,8kHz File (Standard-output of XRecode3) > > - Sox_rate_savL88200_gain_8_lowpass_1_25000_sinc_30000_n43.png > sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -s -a -v -L 88200 gain 8 > lowpass -1 25000 sinc -30000 -n 43 That uses the rate effect, then applies some additional low-pass filtering, presumably to remove the modulator noise. > - Sox_rate_savL88200.png > sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -b 99 -a -v -L 88200 And that's just the rate effect without any additional filtering. I don't quite understand what you're asking. -- Måns Rullgård _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
