Thank you Mans,
my question was a little more profound. I have linked 3 pictures that show the difference between three of many ways. Some filters are also used here. My question was about whether someone here has deeper experiences and has also made listening comparisons about the highest quality command for sox.
I could not attach my 3 example pictures (Spek): Every file 32 Bit Float, Sox-files linear phase. Here the download-link:
my question was a little more profound. I have linked 3 pictures that show the difference between three of many ways. Some filters are also used here. My question was about whether someone here has deeper experiences and has also made listening comparisons about the highest quality command for sox.
I could not attach my 3 example pictures (Spek): Every file 32 Bit Float, Sox-files linear phase. Here the download-link:
https://www.file-upload.net/download-14089057/DSF2WAV.zip.html
The Spek-pictures:
- Xrecode3.png output 352,8kHz File (Standard-output of XRecode3)
- Sox_rate_savL88200_gain_8_lowpass_1_25000_sinc_30000_n43.png
sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -s -a -v -L 88200 gain 8 lowpass -1 25000 sinc -30000 -n 43
- Sox_rate_savL88200.png
sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -b 99 -a -v -L 88200
Regards
Thomas
tsepp2000@xxxxxx writes:
Hello,
does anyone have any experience with which Sox-Mansr parameters to get the
best possible conversion (noise...) into a PCM file? I found this one,
which uses Sox "filters". What does that mean?
To convert DSD to PCM, use the 'rate' effect just as you would to
convert between PCM sample rates.
--
Måns Rullgård
_______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
