> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:15 PM > > Continuing to send RTCP to an old address after that address has been > changed to 0.0.0.0 is one of the most terrible ideas I have heard in a > long time!!! Hehe, I thought someone would hate that one. I thought it was deliciously evil. :) > 5.6: > I think 3840 is used quite a bit in registrations and in Contact URIs, > though I am not aware of a lot of usage of 3841. But I think IMS does > use 3841. (Perhaps that's not a strong argument for considering it in an > interop document.) Yeah good point - someone in my company pointed out the same thing to me as well after I submitted the draft, and apparently we have seen both 3840/3841 used in practice. I usually only see traces when there's a problem, so I guess they haven't had problems? -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
